<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buysiders.com &#187; NFLX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buysiders.com/tag/nflx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buysiders.com</link>
	<description>Investidor Profissional (IP)&#039;s blog: value investing across disciplines and around the globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:33:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two small updates</title>
		<link>http://www.buysiders.com/2010/08/13/two-small-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buysiders.com/2010/08/13/two-small-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food, beverage and tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativedestruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1st one regards AB-InBev and the fact that it's still hard for "foreigners" to fully grasp it. Yesterday's LEX column on the company has flattering but less than enlightened comments and puts way too much weight on the P/E ratio. The 2nd one is about Netflix, and this NYT story sheds some (more) light on the company. It's about creative destruction stimulated by the company itself. It doesn't guarantee Netflix will win as the technology shifts continually challenge its business model, but it gives the company a fighting chance. Again, such a shifting business model is probably not the best playground for investors, but Netflix is still worth tracking for all the other reasons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one regards AB-InBev and the fact that it&#8217;s still hard for &#8220;foreigners&#8221; to fully grasp it. <a title="FT's LEX on AB-InBev" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3/76cc2352-a5ed-11df-9cb9-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">Yesterday&#8217;s LEX column on the company</a> has flattering but less than enlightened comments and puts way too much weight on the P/E ratio. <a title="Buysiders search for the ABI tag" href="http://www.buysiders.com/tag/abi/" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s a quick way to find ABI-related posts</a> on Buysiders.</p>
<p>The second one is about Netflix. <a title="Buysiders search for the NFLX tag" href="http://www.buysiders.com/tag/nflx/" target="_blank">A quick search on Buysiders</a> will yield a lot of material on the company, and <a title="Netflix: Always pushing beyond the envelope" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/business/08every.html" target="_blank">this story in the NY Times</a> sheds some (more) light on the company. It&#8217;s about creative destruction stimulated by the company itself. It  doesn&#8217;t guarantee Netflix will win as the technology shifts continually  challenge its business model, but it gives the company a fighting  chance. Again, such a shifting business model is probably not the best playground for investors, but Netflix is still worth tracking for all the other reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buysiders.com/2010/08/13/two-small-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick update on Netflix</title>
		<link>http://www.buysiders.com/2010/03/15/quick-update-on-netflix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buysiders.com/2010/03/15/quick-update-on-netflix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foodforthought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've discussed crowdsourcing and Netflix more than once. That it works for some uses better than for others is pretty clear... But Netflix has apparently messed up the database used in the original contest and that allowed some contestants to identify the actual people behind the movie choices, despite the promise of privacy. Needless to say, the FCC wasn't too happy about it - and Netflix had to cancel its "Contest 2.0", at least for now. Doesn't mean that the tool doesn't work, it just means that you have to be careful using it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve discussed <a title="Crowdsourcing on Buysiders - DARPA experiment" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/12/06/follow-the-red-balloon/" target="_blank">crowdsourcing</a> and <a title="Netflix's then-smart crowdsourcing initiative" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/" target="_blank">Netflix</a> more <a title="Crowdsourcing revisited on Buysiders" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/11/18/crowdsourcing-revisited/" target="_blank">than once</a>. That it works for some uses better than for others is pretty clear&#8230; But Netflix has apparently <a title="Netflix's privacy snafu" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/technology/13netflix.html?emc=tnt&amp;tntemail0=y" target="_blank">messed up the database</a> used in the original contest and that allowed some contestants to identify the actual people behind the movie choices, despite the promise of privacy. Needless to say, the FCC wasn&#8217;t too happy about it and lawsuits ensued &#8211; and Netflix <a title="Contest 2.0 on hold" href="http://blog.netflix.com/2010/03/this-is-neil-hunt-chief-product-officer.html" target="_blank">had to cancel its &#8220;Contest 2.0&#8243;</a>, at least for now.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t mean that the tool doesn&#8217;t work, it just means that you have to be careful using it. Talk about <a title="How to use a hammer" href="http://www.doityourself.com/video/How-to-Hammer-without-Hitting-your-Fingers-107567380" target="_blank">hitting your finger with a hammer</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buysiders.com/2010/03/15/quick-update-on-netflix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix doing the right things at the right time</title>
		<link>http://www.buysiders.com/2009/10/05/netflix-doing-the-right-things-at-the-right-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buysiders.com/2009/10/05/netflix-doing-the-right-things-at-the-right-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Ballvé</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datamining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onlineservices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netflix is one of the most admirable cases around on corporate strategy AND execution. It shows how you can make billions out of simple things. That said, they have to kill a lion a year to stay ahead. Investment-wise, we never got to the point where we felt we knew enough to invest in them - and don't regret not doing it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netflix is <a title="Netflix on Wired" href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-10/ff_netflix" target="_blank">one of the most admirable cases</a> around on corporate strategy AND execution. Their products are not exactly cutting edge, but their strategy, execution and specifically data use is out of this world. It shows how you can make billions out of simple things. That said, other than the data culture (a huge missed opportunity by Blockbuster in terms of the head start it could have had), they have to kill a lion a year to stay ahead. Investment-wise, we never got to the point where we felt we knew enough to invest in them &#8211; and don&#8217;t regret not doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buysiders.com/2009/10/05/netflix-doing-the-right-things-at-the-right-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix&#8217;s smart crowdsourcing initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.buysiders.com/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buysiders.com/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onlineservices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.invprof.com.br/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Netflix Prize has been awarded and it's a great example of crowdsourcing. But is such "open collaboration" a tool for every situation? How open do you really want to be? Some are looking at his and saying "hold your horses". That's always good advice in our book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago, Netflix wanted to improve its movie recommendation system and decided on an experiment: let people have a go at it. The rules and official proposal are <a title="Netflix contest rules" href="http://www.netflixprize.com//rules" target="_blank">here</a>, but the main idea was that if you could improve Netflix&#8217;s recommendations by 10%, you&#8217;d get a cool US$ 1mm. That contest <a title="Netflix Prize official announcement" href="http://www.netflixprize.com//community/viewtopic.php?id=1537" target="_blank">ended on July 27th, 2009</a> with huge success &#8211; not just for the winners, <a title="Netflix Prize benefits even some &quot;losers&quot; - NYT" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/22/technology/internet/22netflix.html" target="_blank">but for other contestants as well</a> who claim that the internal payoff of the learning efforts involved was already over the US$ 10mm figure. It&#8217;s a great example of crowdsourcing, and there are <a title="Crowdsourcing journalism at The Guardian" href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/four-crowdsourcing-lessons-from-the-guardians-spectacular-expenses-scandal-experiment/" target="_blank">other examples</a> of so-called &#8220;Open&#8221; business models (<a title="Innocentive website" href="http://www.innocentive.com/" target="_blank">Innocentive</a> jumps to mind).</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not all that matters: is crowdsourcing then a substitute for companies&#8217; R&amp;D demands? Does it always work? How open do you really want to be? Some people <a title="The crowd is wise - when it's focused" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/technology/internet/19unboxed.html" target="_blank">are looking at it</a> and saying &#8220;hold your horses&#8221;. That&#8217;s always a good advice in our book.</p>
<p><span id="more-153"></span></p>
<p>As for Netflix, they&#8217;re happy enough to have a Netflix Prize 2 on the works. Very smart: it keeps the ball rolling and takes advantage of the community they built. The press coverage doesn&#8217;t hurt, either.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s more. We&#8217;d argue that the benefits of the Netflix Prize in terms of research in statistics/ data mining/ etc. in large data sets may be felt for years. It&#8217;s interesting to consider this in terms of efficiency gains for many different types of companies. It&#8217;s something companies all around the world should be paying attention to.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video interview with Reed Hastings, Netflix&#8217;s CEO, at the time of the award.</p>
<p><object id="cnbcplayer" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="380" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="type" value="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="quality" value="best" /><param name="scale" value="noscale" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="salign" value="lt" /><param name="src" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1269310369/code/cnbcplayershare" /><param name="name" value="cnbcplayer" /><embed id="cnbcplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="380" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1269310369/code/cnbcplayershare" name="cnbcplayer" salign="lt" bgcolor="#000000" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" quality="best" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Links:</span></strong></p>
<p><a title="Crowdsourcing on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing" target="_blank">Crowdsourcing page on Wikipedia</a></p>
<p><a title="The Rise of Crowdsourcing" href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html" target="_blank">Jeff Howe&#8217;s classic article on Wired</a>, his <a title="Jeff Howe's book at Amazon.com" href="http://www.amazon.com/Crowdsourcing-Power-Driving-Future-Business/dp/0307396215/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1248796206&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">book</a> and his <a title="Jeff Howe's blog" href="http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/" target="_blank">blog</a></p>
<p><a title="Netflix Prize 2 - teaser" href="http://www.netflixprize.com//community/viewtopic.php?id=1520" target="_blank">The teaser for Netflix Prize 2</a></p>
<p><a title="Winning the Netflix Prize - NYT, Oct. '08" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/magazine/23Netflix-t.html?_r=1" target="_blank">Winning the Netflix Prize</a> &#8211; NY Times, October 2008 (huge article with <a title="Search Engineers video - NYT, Oct. '08" href="http://video.nytimes.com/video/2008/11/21/magazine/1194833560594/search-engineers.html" target="_blank">a video</a> that apparently can&#8217;t be embedded here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buysiders.com/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
