We don’t have any intention to be the “ultimate source for all things Buffett”, as a lot of people already do a great job at this and we thank them for uncovering these pearls. But this video is special. The parts on “moats” add up to some of his most detailed comments yet on the subject.

We don’t think it’s any exaggeration to say that Buffett has transcended the investment realm and that this is interesting for people in all walks of life. We’re certainly making backup copies.

Price is the key, and many investors forget that it’s not enough that the business is great and the managers competent and even that the company has the “outside signs”/ usual “seals” of corporate governance or credit ratings – or even environmental best practices – when it comes to estimating a range of values… Corporate governance and alignment must be great in the real world. Unfortunately, that is very hard to find and hard to quantify, so those seeking algebraic approaches to long-term investing do so at their own risk.

Which takes us to “Anti-portfolio one”. This comes courtesy of a reader who was discussing precisely the issue of price with us a few days ago. Then he found a pearl of an article in the New York Times dated February 20th, 2000 – the peak of the Internet/ Nasdaq bubble – where a few managers listed their chosen stock to own until January 1st, 2010. That is, if you could own only one stock from early 2000 for the next ten years, what would it be?

The answers are interesting because a few of these companies haven’t survived, one was the object of a major accounting scandal, and so on. But we don’t want to focus on the companies themselves, but on the reasons given, the “case” made at the time. The arguments, especially regarding the earnings multiples at the time, seem preposterous and could be dismissed as “bubble talk”, but recent years have proven that we don’t learn this kind of lesson easily… And we go back to the point of price: yes, multiples can be misleading, but regardless of the measure, the price you pay has to take into consideration that even the best-planned strategies executed by the best managers can go wrong in too many ways.

In the other corner, “Anti-portfolio two” was found by our Healthcare analyst when he was researching a relatively newcomer to the sector and found that traditional VC firm Bessemer Venture Partners was one of the seed investors. The firm itself built an “anti-portfolio” section in their website that, well, has to be seen to be believed – and still Bessemer has done quite well… This example is about what Buffett calls “sins of omission” – he often mentions Wal-Mart, which he tried to penny-pinch and ended up losing “Billions” over time as the company became the behemoth it is today.

Finally, we’d like to thank our reader and urge others to follow his example! As always, send us your suggestions via the e-mail editor@buysiders.com .

1) By Lord Khaner: “We have CEO family trees; people who’ve had lots of success have trained people who had lots of success“. For those of us who are enamored with “built to last”, “good to great” and “business models/competitive advantage”, it’s nice to keep in mind that companies are run by real people with processes/systems/culture/discipline/execution ‘kits’ that sometimes ‘scale’. Gillette’s CFO took its ZBB to Avon. Lemann was at Gillette’s board and later Marcel brought the system to Ambev and then Inbev.

It’s funny, but in Brazil CEO family trees are hard to find in Brazil. Interestingly, at the global level in the asset management world there are lots of examples. Bob Rubin and Julian Robertson are, for example, prolific fund manager family trees.

2) Julian Robertson: characterized himself as the “anti-gold bug”. Likes the Norwegian krona is concerned about the British Pound.

3) Einhorn: using options to bet against Japanese long-term rates lowering; can clearly limit losses while creating as much leverage as possible. “Picking among fiat currencies is like picking your favorite dental procedure; chose gold instead”.

4) Joel Greenblatt video:  Among other things, he announces the launching his www.formulainvesting.com site – that he also marketed at VIC. Worth visiting.

5) “Waste Management” emerged as one of the ideas (Paul Isaac). The waste management/waste-to-energy sector has been under consolidation (there are clear local scale advantages) and there are other strong players like Republic Services, Covanta Holdings. This magazine looks good for the sector: http://wasteage.com/